![]() ![]() ![]() When you're used to devices that reboot in under a minute, a 5-10 minute reboot is majorly annoying. What I do find to be WAY slower than I'd like is a full boot/reboot on a 220. I don't find it to be a big deal on 220's, just something you deal with. Palo Alto Networks PA-220 Series, PA-400 Series, PA-800 Series, PA-3200 Series, PA-5200 Series, PA-5450, PA-7000 Series, and VM Series Next-Generation Firewall with PAN-OS 10. The Palo Alto Networks PA-400 Series Series Next-Generation Firewalls, comprising the PA410, PA-415, PA-440, PA-445, PA-450, and PA-460, brings ML-Powered NGFW capabilities to distributed enterprise branch offices, retail locations, and midsize businesses. Panorama isn't something you'd get for a 1 off firewall though. Palo Alto PA-220 PA-220 Next Generation Firewall Function 1 Concurrent User : 100 - 150 Users PA-220 Spec - 500Mbps FW throughput - 150Mbps threat prevention - 64K sessions (max.) - 8 - 1G copper - 15 security zones (max.) - 2500 policy rules (max. Getting Panorama (which is pricey) will make life easier if it makes sense (dealing with multiple firewalls), as you can do all your data analysis and setting in there, then just send the commit, as opposed to working entirely in the slower direct interface on the 220. ![]() ![]() Other than initial trial and error learning, a lot of commit's aren't something you should need to do long term basis, so not something I think is a big concern. However, as a whole, it's very tolerable IMO. I haven't used an 820 yet, but people say they are fast like the 3000 series and above. It's far worse on the older 200 and 500's (even one's with SSDs). Advanced Protection with Next-Generation Firewalls Secure cloud applications with a Next-Generation Firewall Compliance Made Easier With Next-Generation Firewalls Conclusion 1. Commit's are very slow, again, in comparison, but a < 60 second commit isn't "painfully" slow IMO. Home About Contact Advertise Cisco (12) Cybersecurity (8) Palo Alto (4) Azure (1) AWS (1) Fortinet Checkpoint Latest. I'm moving to PA and have used a lot of other firewalls, including Sophos UTM SG and yes, the PA-220 is VERY slow to administer in comparison. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |